<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finally &#8230; A Real Awards Show</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sofachip.com/2008/01/27/finally-a-real-awards-show/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sofachip.com/2008/01/27/finally-a-real-awards-show/</link>
	<description>Not Just for Couch Potatoes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:30:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LauraBelle</title>
		<link>http://www.sofachip.com/2008/01/27/finally-a-real-awards-show/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>LauraBelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sofachip.com/2008/01/27/finally-a-real-awards-show/#comment-317</guid>
		<description>I apologize if I don&#039;t know the correct status of who was not allowing the SAG members to appear on the other awards shows. By the multiple stories going back and forth and everyone blaming everyone else, it&#039;s certainly hard to tell which way to go with it. And being a writer myself, for me not to approve of the writers&#039; strike would be a little odd, wouldn&#039;t you think? I&#039;m not anti writers&#039; strike, I&#039;m anti crappy programming because of the strike. And just as I perhaps acted on false information, it seems as if you may have done the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apologize if I don&#8217;t know the correct status of who was not allowing the SAG members to appear on the other awards shows. By the multiple stories going back and forth and everyone blaming everyone else, it&#8217;s certainly hard to tell which way to go with it. And being a writer myself, for me not to approve of the writers&#8217; strike would be a little odd, wouldn&#8217;t you think? I&#8217;m not anti writers&#8217; strike, I&#8217;m anti crappy programming because of the strike. And just as I perhaps acted on false information, it seems as if you may have done the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://www.sofachip.com/2008/01/27/finally-a-real-awards-show/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sofachip.com/2008/01/27/finally-a-real-awards-show/#comment-316</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Screen Actors Guild. The Writers Guild put their foot down earlier, against allowing any of the SAG members from appearing onscreen in a telecast,&quot;

They most certainly didn&#039;t.  SAG asked their members not to go to the awards in solidarity of the writers:

http://www.sag.org/statement-screen-actors-guild-president-alan-rosenberg-regarding-golden-globe-awards

It certainly seems like you don&#039;t approve of the writers strike based on this comment and others you&#039;ve made on this site, but that doesn&#039;t mean you have to spread false information about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Screen Actors Guild. The Writers Guild put their foot down earlier, against allowing any of the SAG members from appearing onscreen in a telecast,&#8221;</p>
<p>They most certainly didn&#8217;t.  SAG asked their members not to go to the awards in solidarity of the writers:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sag.org/statement-screen-actors-guild-president-alan-rosenberg-regarding-golden-globe-awards" rel="nofollow">http://www.sag.org/statement-screen-actors-guild-president-alan-rosenberg-regarding-golden-globe-awards</a></p>
<p>It certainly seems like you don&#8217;t approve of the writers strike based on this comment and others you&#8217;ve made on this site, but that doesn&#8217;t mean you have to spread false information about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
